Is the Co-Op in trouble?

 The headline above is from ‘The Grocer’ website and is dated 03 07 2026

I ask this wide ranging question due to a minor matter which the Co-Op has failed to resolve over more than 3 months now. This, together with the lack of any meaningful communication (other than apologies), has made me wonder.

On 7^th May this year I reported a small problem to the Co-Op, with regard to their Town Green/Aughton shop, and as I type the problem is still unaddressed despite my continuing to raise it with them on 4 or 5 occasions. The problem? A bollard, which protects the cycle rack outside their shop from vehicles that can and do block it from being used by cyclists.

It’s happened before but repairs have previously been reasonably swift. In reality it’s not vehicles knocking the bollard over but teenagers rocking it until it eventually became detached from the ground. A more substantial bollard is required so it’s no surprise that having re-fixed the old one a while back in exactly the same way that it’s happened again.

If this was just an ordinary for profit shop who’d had to install a cycle rack as say part of a planning permission then I’d get it. They probably wouldn’t care less, but this is supposed to be an ethical business mutually owned by its members, like me. The Co-Op should be promoting environmentally ways to access their shops not effectively doing pretty much the opposite by ignoring requests to fix a small matter like this.

Yes, I’m disappointed that this matter has seemingly been ignored and that nobody has given me an explanation as to why it hasn’t been addressed, but at the same time I continue to pick up vibes that suggest the Co-Op is really struggling to address local shop-based issues. Could the issues raised by ‘The Grocer’ be at the heart of the issue?

I have no issues with the staff in the shop I use most frequently, indeed they’re always helpful and polite, even when I have a grumble about this matter. No, the problems seem to be further up the management chain, a chain that is supposedly accountable to the members of the Co-Op!

Is this mutual business in danger of arriving at a similar position to Lancashire County Cricket Club where their members are in dispute with their own committee?

What’s going on at the Co-Op?

 

The sport I love is actually in crisis

Being born up in Nottinghamshire, it’ll be no surprise to anyone who knows anything about cricket that I love the game. Larwood, Voce, Rice, Sobers, Hadlee, Randall are my cricketing heroes and trips down to Trent Bridge to watch County Championship matches are my highlight of each year.

Looking over Trent Bridge from the Derek Randall suite - June 26

 

 As a Notts supporter I obviously want my team to do well and in 2025 we won the County Championship under the excellent leadership of Haseeb Hameed and I was over the moon with delight. But below the surface all is far from being well with the way cricket is structured in England.

Lancashire’s members are effectively involved in a civil war with their own leadership/committee, Yorkshire are trying to demutualise creating all kinds to trouble within that club’s membership. Quite a number of the smaller counties are going bust. The Hundred has taken the best weeks of the cricketing year out of the calendar for all other formats. Those peak summer days should be there for the County Championship which is now shunted to the beginning and end of each season as an after-thought.

Like all major sports these days it’s all about money and the selling of souls for it is what happens. With regard to Lancashire their committee have successfully redeveloped Old Trafford; indeed you could say they’ve done remarkably well. However, on the pitch Lancashire cricket has been pretty dire for quite some years and that’s why the Lancashire members are in open rebellion. Having a brilliant ground but a crap cricket team is not a good mix for a club that exists to be a great cricket team that just wants to be better than their bitter rivals across the Pennines.

Yorkshire, we’re told, needs money and a lot of it in the form of private investment to redevelop its Headingley ground and the powers that be think this can’t be achieved without demutualising their structure so that it becomes a private company. As a Liberal mutuals mean everything to me and in my humble opinion we’ve spent far too many years taking mutuals, such as building societies, and turning them into banks. Yes, I can hear all you Conservatives out there shouting only private investment is any good whilst you decry and plan to try to take more mutuals into private hands. I get it, you don’t like common ownership and neither, sadly, does much of our political establishment with even my own party of choice being well meaning but actually doing little to promote mutuals.

And what about cricket on TV? Cricket sold its soul to Sky many years ago meaning live free to view cricket is rare indeed these days. I’m sure money was the rather obvious reason to move to pay per view TV but the unintended consequence has been to make the game one that few people take an interest in as it’s hardly ever seen these days. And no the partly free to view Hundred is not cricket; it’s probably nearer to baseball than the English summer game.

For me the sweet spot for short format cricket was the much missed 40 over Sunday League. I struggle to look upon the Twenty/20 (T20) as cricket at all.

The beleaguered county teams have reacted to them being sidelined by using You Tube to show their games and a great innovation it has been, although some counties coverage is sadly dire and not up to the high standard of say Nottinghamshire’s You Tube feed, which brilliant and I watch regularly.

So how can cricket be saved in England both from outside factors and indeed from itself? A few ideas of mine…….

* The ridiculous Hundred needs to be changed to the more normal, if too short, T20 format.

* England contracted players need to allowed/encouraged to play for their counties too when at all possible.

* The high summer weeks need County Championship games to be played.

* There may well be a need to be a reduce the number of fully professional county teams – presently 18 - say down to 12.

* Three Divisions of 6 teams, each playing 12 County Championship games per season, with the 3^rd division being semi-pro.

* The County 50 over cup needs to be taken seriously. Presently it’s not and unsurprisingly it’s the format that the England team often struggles most with in recent years.

But will I defend mutual run clubs to the bitter (probably very bitter if Yorkshire is anything to go by) end? Yes I will, unless an alternative structure can can be found where county club members can have a very significant say in the running of their clubs. And I don’t mean here some kind of consultative forum where tea and sympathy is handed out by the powers that be only for everything the members have said to be totally ignored. I accept that we live in a very commercial world and no matter how much I find it distasteful sport will continue to be about money first and last and always. I just hope cricket will not become as discredited as football has in the process.

Lancashire CCC has ended up in civil war probably because, it inadvertently or otherwise, pushed its members, who actually own the club, into the long grass. Doing so whilst not having a competitive cricket team, which is the be all and end all for the members, has been a recipe for how not to do things. For all the financial progress and much improved stadium, what’s the point if there’s only a second rate team to go and watch in the cricket season?

Am I optimistic? Well I try to be, as cricket is very important to me. It’s my go to thing for relaxation in my retirement either at Trent Bridge or via You Tube. I do like international cricket but county cricket is more important to me. It’s great that women’s cricket is coming on so well even if the best international team is still the Aussies. Another piece of good news this summer has been the England men’s team wicket keeping coach being Sarah Taylor, who is the best keeper I’ve ever seen male or female. So yes, I’m still just about optimistic that cricket will get itself off the self-made sticky wicket it finds itself batting on but, being realistic, it’s going to need a lot of heavy rolling.

PS. I drafted this piece on the very day that Garfield Sobers passed away but not knowing that sad fact. RIP Garfield the greatest cricketer of them all.

After thought - In an odd twist the CEO of Notts, who'd only been at the club for just less than a year, has jumped ship to be CEO of Lancs!

 

Planning (as in land use) and why it’s an utter mess

 

The huge Maghull East Urban Extension before building commenced

 

Unless you’ve been on a local authority planning committee you’ll only really have come across it if you’ve applied for permission to build say an extension on your house or have participated in a campaign to try to stop an unwelcome planning application. Even then you’ll not really know all the ins and outs, but then who does?

I’ve been prompted to write this posting following two recent conversations

The trouble is Planning law and regulations change often, so what you thought was the case just a couple of years back may no longer be so today. You see governments of all colours love to tinker with Planning, like they do with the running of the NHS.

When was the last time you didn’t hear a government saying that more houses need to be built? I bet it was many years ago. Of course, governments set targets for house building (which are rarely, if ever, met), they tell local authorities to ensure more houses get built and they get them to adopt plans that’ll supposedly make sure they’re built, or maybe not. They slacken Green Belt restrictions or tell local authorities to do so to allow more house building. Then, when all else fails and the houses aren’t built to the required numbers, they blame the Planning system for being too slow, too bureaucratic or local authorities for hindering house building. This routine flows through pretty much all governments and has done for as long as I can recall being involved in politics (1980) and it’s probably been the case well before that arbitrary date of mine.

Developers only do what’s in their best interests

Land developers/building companies don’t just build when they have purchased the land and have Planning Permission no matter how loud governments shout at them. They’ll only build when is suits them, in other words when they can sell quickly and at a high price. If the housing market is in the doldrums they’ll sit on the land until it and the economy pick up. Following that aside let’s get back to the Planning system.

There must be literally reams and reams of Planning documents, regulations, advice and guidance produced over the years by both governments and local authorities and frankly only local authority senior planning officers, Planning Inspectors and specialists in the field of Planning will have any detailed knowledge of them. It’s a world all of its own, full of acronyms and in-language probably meant to keep ordinary folk at arms length; a bit like the management of education, pretty much beyond all but those deeply involved.

Why do we need more houses?

Well, a big reason is because we tend to live in smaller family units. I can recall the days when 3 generations of families lived in one house but that’s unusual these days. But it’s not just the number of houses, it’s the type of housing units that’s the big issue.

For example, we have too few social housing properties (council houses/housing association houses), far too few, and that dates back to ‘Right to Buy’, yet we build hardly any new ones. This, in turn, pushes those who have no choice but to rent into private sector renting and again, in turn, government needs to subsidise the rent payable as it’s well beyond the means of many poorer renters. So governments have effectively decided to subsidise private renting rather than build sufficient new social housing. There are other things missing from our housing stock as well, such as too few smaller units (1 and 2 bed), too few adapted houses/bungalows for people with disabilities/the elderly. Building 3, 4 and 5 bed houses is what makes the most money for developers/builders so that’s what we mostly get, like it or not.

Planning Committees

I only spent a couple of years on a Planning Committee of my local council and it was the last two years of my time as a borough councillor. Being knee deep in planning regulations and effectively being told by professional planning officers how I had to treat each application didn’t endear me to Planning. It was being told to act in a quasi-judicial way rather than looking at the balance of issues based on my own judgement that so ill-suited me. As a free thinking Liberal, doing as I was effectively told to do went against the grain so to speak.

Don’t get me wrong the planning officers were invariably nice and well informed people just doing their jobs based on the regulations (seemingly ever changing regulations) sent down to them by whichever government was in power at the time. It was definitely me not fitting into what felt like a straight-jacket which was forever being tightened (as regulations were relaxed) restricting my ability to have any meaningful say in outcomes. Suffice to say I did not enjoy it or frankly see much purpose to it. Getting blamed for approving applications I actually thought were as inappropriate as those who were opposing them was a frustrating process. Ordinary folk hope that planning committees will hear all the evidence presented to them and make the right decision. In reality, many things that are put forward as ‘objections’ are not allowed to be considered, no wonder people who have engaged in the Planning process leave feeling that the system is stacked against them; it is!

Get building on high grade agricultural land

But I suppose what really put me off Planning was the decision to build the massive urban extension to the east of Maghull; building that is ongoing now. Back in the late 1990’s I led what turned out to be a successful campaign to stop building on the very same piece of land. My motivation was very much that the fields in question were pretty much made up of the highest grades of agricultural land that has long grown the food that we eat. It made no sense to me at all to even consider such land for building purposes. Sadly, some 10 years later the very same land was put forward for house building again (some 1600 and counting houses) and absolutely no allowance for the high grade agricultural land was given at all!

The UK is hardly food self-sufficient, in fact it’s very far from it, yet we build on high grade agricultural land without a care in the world. What kind of planning, with a small p, is that? Depriving ourselves and future generations of excellent food producing land is complete and utter madness! So my involvement with Planning has left me feeling the system is stacked against our better interests because, to me, it obviously is.

Planning should never should be considered in isolation because it not only affects house building but also, industrial uses, our environment, health facilities (they rarely, if ever, expand to meet new housing developments) education (as in school places) and transportation (because we keep building car-dependent developments). And for the sake of clarity I’m not one to decry all house building, indeed I’ve long tried to champion the building of social housing because, in my view, the lack of it is at the very heart of our present housing crisis.

A political punishment?

And to close this little rant what I think is an amusing aside. I could never quite get my head around why a small but significant group of councillors, across all political groups, actually wanted to be on a Planning Committee. Let’s say it was 20% of councillors, whilst the other 80% would not go anyway near it (with or without a barge pole) and considered it a political punishment if they were placed on it!

The Maghull East Urban Extension as building work commenced

 

 

The NHS Walk-In Centre Maghull Doesn’t Have

Although retired from active politics these days I did notice some social media comments about the lack of an NHS Walk-In Centre in the town during the recent local elections and thought I’d put together a bit of a potted history of the matter.

Maghull Health Centre in 2019

Back in my time as a local Sefton Councillor (1999 - 2015) and indeed as Leader of the Council (2004 – 2011) considerable efforts were made to try to resolve this problem, not least by my then Council colleague Geoff Howe.

When the concept of NHS Walk-In Centres was established it didn’t take long for the former Litherland Town Hall to be identified for such a Centre and as we all know it’s been there for maybe 20 years now. At the time, an obvious concern was that the public transport links to the Centre, particularly from the East Parishes part of Sefton Borough (Lydiate, Maghull, Aintree & Melling) were, at best, poor. On that basis I made clear that whilst supporting the Litherland Centre I wanted to put on record the need for a similar type facility in Maghull. This would be most likely be achieved by the rebuilding of Maghull Health Centre.

Maghull Health Centre had been constructed around the early 1970’sfollowing the considerable efforts and campaigning of a Maghull-based GP, Dr. Reg Yorke. It’s still, in 2026, very much as it was built at least on the outside, although refurbished a few times inside. The point being that the population in the East Parishes has continued to rise whilst the Health Centre has not moved much with the times so to speak.

The pressure to rebuild this Health Centre has therefore always been there for at least the past 25 years yet all that pressure has failed to produce results. It’s as though it has never been a top priority for NHS planners and even if it was the money has not been there to actually make it happen.

I recall, it must have been around 2010ish, that after more pushing and shoving by Cllr. Geoff Howe and others I got a phone call pretty much out of the blue from a senior officer on Sefton Council who told me that he was now sure the NHS was going to take the project forward. I was utterly delighted but sadly soon very disappointed, frustrated and even being blamed for saying publicly that the battle had been won when in fact the NHS had not pressed the start button or they’d had second thoughts very soon after doing so. I never really got to the bottom of why Sefton Council had been told the project was finally a runner when it wasn’t.

Around a similar time period (2008 – 2010) two other significant building projects were being taken forward in both Maghull and Lydiate. We’d won a very long-running campaign to get a swimming pool/leisure centre built in the area by Sefton Council and it’s presently thriving on KGV Park. However, it’s not as originally conceived. Yes, there was always going to be a gym & swimming pool, but the plans did not include the moving of Maghull Library into it. That only came about because the NHS pulled out of the original scoping for the building. It was to have had an NHS facility within it probably associated with GP’s based there being able to prescribe, where appropriate, fitness classes (swimming and gym) for patients in the very same building. An innovative idea which the likes of Cllr. Geoff Howe and I were only to willing to back but sadly the NHS pulled out. The space that was originally pencilled in for the NHS became available around the very time a condition survey had all but condemned the old Maghull Library building. The rest, as they say, is history.

Along side the Leisure Centre project but quite separate to it Lydiate Parish Council was planning and indeed building its ‘Village Centre’ facility in Lambshear Lane. The then Chairperson of the Council, Dave Russell, was very keen to try to draw the NHS in so that they could deliver some health services from the building. Talks took place but sadly the NHS was unable to take up the offer of the building being partly constructed with them in mind. Yet another lost health opportunity in Lydiate and Maghull.

Personally, I found it hard to build a meaningful relationships with NHS health planners not least due to the ever changing methods of doing business caused by regular reorganisations. Not only that people seemed to move jobs by the minute, a bit like the Police so you had to keep starting all over again.*

It’s all rather a depressing story health-wise from my active campaigning days, although I do realise that others will have been trying to reactivate the NHS Drop-In/Rebuild of Maghull Health Centre project since the likes of Geoff Howe, Dave Russell and I ceased to be local councillors

* It’s worth bearing in mind that at a national and local level we’ve been through quite a number of NHS reorganisations in recent times. Locally, we gained two Primary Care Trusts in Sefton Borough (North & South), then they were merged after a few years into one Sefton Primary care Trust, then we went on to Clinical Commissioning Groups, and well you get my drift…...

 

Just 13% of those voting put an X in the Tory box in Aughton!

I made mention before the English local elections of a reasonably well to do community on my doorstep – Aughton, West Lancashire. To me that community has always been Conservative, at least that is until quite recent times. Indeed, I was once told of a tongue in cheek-type remark along the lines of ‘you used to have to show your Conservative membership card to buy a house there’.

Aughton Landscape

 

You see, I cycle a lot around Aughton and have done so for maybe the past 15 years. When you cycle you notice things. The lack of Conservative posters and stake boards has been an obvious one. I only saw one house with a Tory stake board in this May’s elections.

What I also noticed, in the last election when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader (2019), was Labour posters on expensive Aughton properties. That would just not have ben allowed when Aughton was true blue. But this year I didn’t spot any Labour posters.*

Back in the 1990’s, when I was a Maghull Town Councillor, I went to a Parish Councils conference in London organised by the National Association of Local Councils (NALC). It seemed to be dominated by Conservatives from the Shires and not really the place for a leftie Liberal like me. But what I recall most about it was actually the train ride home where I found myself sitting by what turned out to be a lady who told me she was a Conservative Councillor on West Lancs Council and an Independent member of Aughton Parish Council. That combination of being party political on one council whilst being independent on another, for the same community, struck me as most odd. She was a nice lady but every inch a Conservative and, of course, I expected nothing less from an Aughton councillor. That was around 30 years ago, for context.

Today, I looked at the election result for the ward that covers Aughton Civil Parish and what seems to be the Holborn area of Ormskirk. The Conservative candidate received just 13% of the votes cast and came 4^th! The winning candidate was from the ‘Our West Lancashire Party’ with 39% of the votes cast.

Would the last Conservative in Aughton please turn out the lights comes to mind, but seriously, this shows how fundamentally our politics has changed even in wealthy communities that were once rock solid Conservative.

The headlines from this May’s English local elections have pretty much all been about the hammering that our governing Labour Party suffered and it was of catastrophic proportions, but the losses the once formidable Conservative Party also suffered are of great significance too.

* I obviously don’t cycle every road in Aughton so I may have missed some political posters, I might add.

 

A brush with a Brian Rix-type farce

I use eBay quite a lot and rarely have any issues with it, but I have to relate this, with hindsight, quite ridiculous story. I know some folks really despise eBay but I’ve never fathomed why.

 

A few weeks back I ordered a set of 10 small modelling paint brushes, but only one of the set arrived through my letter box a few days later. I contacted the seller to tell them what had happened and that the packaging was intact so the other 9 brushes could not have fallen out. I even told them which of the individually numbered brushes I actually received. Of course, I asked them to send me the other 9 brushes.

The response was simply that what was dispatched to me was what I ordered. I pointed out in return that what I ordered was 10 paint brushes but only one had arrived. I got no further response.

So what next? A grumble to eBay which a few days later ended up with them telling me that the seller had informed them that I’d got what I ordered so no refund was due to me.

I appealed, pointing out, again, that I only received 1 of the 10 paint brushes, that I didn’t want a refund, I just wanted the seller to send me the other 9.

eBay then came back to me saying I was due a refund (what I’d specifically NOT asked for) and that I’d soon get a pre-paid return address label to send the one paint brush I actually held back! By my calculations I then had no paint brushes at all!

The label arrived and the single brush was despatched back to the seller. But why did the seller want a single brush back, when they could have spent the postage sending me the other 9 brushes? It’s been a brush with a mad, mad world, but at least I got a refund for the 10 paint brushes that I've now had to order from another eBay seller..

*****

For the youngsters amongst you Brian Rix was an actor-manager, who produced a record-breaking sequence of long-running farces on the London stage. I think he’d be proud of my little farce.

 

Why trams won’t be appearing in Liverpool

No, don’t worry, this is not another rehearsal of why ‘Merseytram’ failed back in the early 2000’s. That one has done the rounds probably too many times!

 

Back when the Tories were in power (pre June 2024) they allocated money to Liverpool City Region for transport infrastructure improvements and Labour has, in effect, confirmed that chunk of money. As any Merseysider will know the money is in significant part to pay for buses dressed up as trams and they’ll be running, we’re told, to Liverpool (John Lennon) Airport. Readers with longer memories will recall the first ‘Merseytram’ line was NOT going to go to Liverpool Airport and that caused quite a stink back then. So the City Region leaders knew what would happen if they talked about any new transport infrastructure without making an airport link, from the city centre, a priority.

Bendy-Buses!

Why not resurrect the tram scheme and build the first line to……. well you know where? Well, what they actually came up with were ‘Bendy-Buses/Boris-type Buses/Gliders’ (there may well be more names for them but I’ll omit the rude ones), in effect buses dressed up as trams and it seems our Labour gov’ confirmed the money could be spent on them. So, I guess, we’ll be getting them at some point.

Tram Raid

But why no trams? I’d always thought that the Tory and now Labour governments would be reluctant to fund trams in Liverpool/Merseyside due to cost and maybe the political hang-over from the ‘Merseytram’ demise. I had no evidence of this but felt that was the situation. Then Private Eye No.1672 (3^rd to 16^th April) dropped through my letter box and bingo on page 17 under its ‘Signal Failures’ column my thoughts were effectively confirmed under the heading ‘Tram Raid’.

West Yorks shunted back into sidings

Yes, that article is actually all about the farce over in West Yorkshire where their long promised tram/light rail system has been given more green then red lights than you could shake a stick at. And yes, of course, it’s been kicked back into the long political grass once again. But it’s the reason why it’s been kicked into the long grass that links to Liverpool City Region not proposing a tram system. You see it’s the words ‘might not be trams after all’ and ‘check whether [wait for it] buses would be more viable’ in that Private Eye article that made the penny drop for me. In essence Liverpool City Region was almost certainly told, by the last Tory government, don’t ask for a tram system as we won’t fund it and despite Labour coming to power in June 2024 the ‘advice’ has still been the same.

No Merseytram II

So now I think we know why Liverpool City Region leaders put in a transport bid for bendy-buses when, like West Yorks, local folk were fully expecting Merseytram II to be proposed by our local leaders. They didn’t bid for what they knew we all wanted/needed on Merseyside because they’d been told not to bother and they didn’t want to end up in the eternal shall we/shan’t we position that poor old West Yorks is in! Pragmatic, you could say, but my feeling is that settling for 3^rd best in a contest where trams were both number 1 and 2 could well come back to haunt Liverpool/Merseyside Labour leaders.

                                             What Liverpool won't be getting - 

A Geater Manchester Metro tram in Rochdale